Comments on: Vista Delayed Again? http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/ Phil Steinmeyer's rumblings on the game biz, programming, and life Sun, 11 Dec 2011 09:02:40 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Bob Smith http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-50421 Bob Smith Fri, 13 Apr 2007 23:41:14 +0000 http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/#comment-50421 Wassup Phil!!!! Wassup Phil!!!!

]]> By: Phil Steinmeyer http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3402 Phil Steinmeyer Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:31:01 +0000 http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/#comment-3402 Even if you're right about that, it's an awfully weaselly statement, especially since, in their last slip, they said Vista would be don in Nov. '06, but just wouldn't ship to the public until Jan '07 to satisfy PC manufacturer requirements. Now, they're sliding until as late as June '07 (if they mean fiscal, not calendar) or perhaps Oct '07 (if they mean calendar), and still being hedgy about that ('on track', 'when the product is ready')... Even if you’re right about that, it’s an awfully weaselly statement, especially since, in their last slip, they said Vista would be don in Nov. ‘06, but just wouldn’t ship to the public until Jan ‘07 to satisfy PC manufacturer requirements.

Now, they’re sliding until as late as June ‘07 (if they mean fiscal, not calendar) or perhaps Oct ‘07 (if they mean calendar), and still being hedgy about that (’on track’, ‘when the product is ready’)…

]]> By: anonymous http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3401 anonymous Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:08:52 +0000 http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/#comment-3401 That's probably Microsoft's *fiscal* year, so 2H means some time in the first half of calendar year 2006. That’s probably Microsoft’s *fiscal* year, so 2H means some time in the first half of calendar year 2006.

]]>