<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista Delayed Again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/</link>
	<description>Phil Steinmeyer's rumblings on the game biz, programming, and life</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/#comment-50421</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 23:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/#comment-50421</guid>
		<description>Wassup Phil!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wassup Phil!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Steinmeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/#comment-3402</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Steinmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/#comment-3402</guid>
		<description>Even if you're right about that, it's an awfully weaselly statement, especially since, in their last slip, they said Vista would be don in Nov. '06, but just wouldn't ship to the public until Jan '07 to satisfy PC manufacturer requirements.  

Now, they're sliding until as late as June '07 (if they mean fiscal, not calendar) or perhaps Oct '07 (if they mean calendar), and still being hedgy about that ('on track', 'when the product is ready')...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if you&#8217;re right about that, it&#8217;s an awfully weaselly statement, especially since, in their last slip, they said Vista would be don in Nov. &#8216;06, but just wouldn&#8217;t ship to the public until Jan &#8216;07 to satisfy PC manufacturer requirements.  </p>
<p>Now, they&#8217;re sliding until as late as June &#8216;07 (if they mean fiscal, not calendar) or perhaps Oct &#8216;07 (if they mean calendar), and still being hedgy about that (&#8217;on track&#8217;, &#8216;when the product is ready&#8217;)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/#comment-3401</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/126/vista-delayed-again/#comment-3401</guid>
		<description>That's probably Microsoft's *fiscal* year, so 2H means some time in the first half of calendar year 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s probably Microsoft&#8217;s *fiscal* year, so 2H means some time in the first half of calendar year 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
