<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista, no earlier than Jan. 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/78/windows-vista-no-earlier-than-jan-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/78/windows-vista-no-earlier-than-jan-2007/</link>
	<description>Phil Steinmeyer's rumblings on the game biz, programming, and life</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PhilSteinmeyer.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vista Delayed Again?</title>
		<link>http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/78/windows-vista-no-earlier-than-jan-2007/#comment-3400</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilSteinmeyer.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vista Delayed Again?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsteinmeyer.com/78/windows-vista-no-earlier-than-jan-2007/#comment-3400</guid>
		<description>[...] Almost exactly 4 months ago, Microsoft announced the (then) latest delay to Microsoft Vista, from fall &#8216;06 to January &#8216;07. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Almost exactly 4 months ago, Microsoft announced the (then) latest delay to Microsoft Vista, from fall &#8216;06 to January &#8216;07. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
